Techlivly

“Your Tech Companion for the AI Era”

Algorithm

Online Algorithms: Making Decisions in Real-Time

Gaurab 0

1. Introduction to Online Algorithms

Online algorithms are algorithms designed to process data and make decisions in a sequential, real-time manner, without knowledge of future inputs. Unlike offline algorithms, which have access to the entire input beforehand, online algorithms must operate under uncertainty and make irrevocable decisions as input arrives. This makes online algorithms essential for many real-world systems where decisions must be made on the fly.

1.1 What are Online Algorithms?

Online algorithms are computational procedures that receive their input piece-by-piece, often in a streaming or real-time fashion, and must make decisions at each step without seeing future inputs. Each decision can affect future possibilities, but once made, it usually cannot be reversed.

  • Key feature: Decisions are made incrementally with partial information.
  • Examples: Allocating memory for pages in caching, routing packets in a network, or bidding in real-time auctions.
  • Online algorithms contrast with offline algorithms, which have complete input access from the start.

1.2 Difference Between Online and Offline Algorithms

  • Offline Algorithms:
    • Have access to the full input data before making any decision.
    • Can optimize globally, knowing all constraints and requirements upfront.
    • Example: Sorting a known list of numbers.
  • Online Algorithms:
    • Receive input sequentially and must decide immediately at each step.
    • Cannot revise past decisions based on future input.
    • Must perform well despite uncertainty.
    • Example: Managing cache pages when requests come one at a time.

Summary: Offline algorithms solve problems with full information, while online algorithms work under uncertainty with partial information.

1.3 Importance and Applications of Online Algorithms

Online algorithms are crucial for many practical applications where decisions must be made instantly or data is too large to wait for complete collection:

  • Internet and Networking: Routing data packets, managing network caches.
  • Operating Systems: Memory management, job scheduling.
  • Finance: Algorithmic trading with streaming market data.
  • Cloud Computing: Resource allocation on demand.
  • E-commerce and Advertising: Real-time bidding and recommendation systems.
  • Robotics and Autonomous Systems: Making navigation or control decisions based on sensor data in real-time.

Their ability to provide good enough decisions quickly makes them vital for responsive, adaptive systems.

1.4 Real-Time Decision Making Challenges

Making decisions in real-time without full knowledge introduces several challenges:

  • Uncertainty: Future requests or data are unknown, requiring algorithms to balance immediate and future needs.
  • Irrevocability: Many decisions cannot be undone; poor choices can degrade performance.
  • Performance Guarantee: Ensuring the algorithm performs well compared to an ideal scenario with full information.
  • Resource Constraints: Limited computational power or memory may restrict complexity.
  • Adversarial Inputs: Worst-case scenarios or hostile environments designed to confuse the algorithm.

Effective online algorithms must strategically handle these challenges to achieve reliable performance.

1.5 Overview of Competitive Analysis in Online Algorithms

Competitive analysis is a common framework to evaluate online algorithms:

  • Competitive Ratio: Measures how the performance of an online algorithm compares to an optimal offline algorithm with complete input knowledge. Competitive Ratio=max⁡all inputsCost of Online AlgorithmCost of Optimal Offline Algorithm\text{Competitive Ratio} = \max_{\text{all inputs}} \frac{\text{Cost of Online Algorithm}}{\text{Cost of Optimal Offline Algorithm}}Competitive Ratio=all inputsmax​Cost of Optimal Offline AlgorithmCost of Online Algorithm​
  • A competitive ratio close to 1 means the online algorithm performs nearly as well as the offline optimum.
  • This metric helps quantify the cost of making decisions without full information.
  • Competitive analysis focuses on worst-case scenarios, ensuring robustness even against adversarial inputs.
  • It is a theoretical tool that guides the design and assessment of online algorithms.

2. Core Concepts in Online Algorithm Design

This section covers the fundamental ideas and principles behind how online algorithms are structured and evaluated. It explains the nature of input, how decisions are made without full information, key performance measures, and typical constraints faced by online algorithms.

2.1 Input Model: Sequential and Incremental Data

  • Online algorithms receive their input piece-by-piece in a sequence, rather than all at once.
  • Each new piece of data arrives over time and must be processed immediately.
  • The input is often modeled as a stream or a sequence of requests.
  • The algorithm must react to each input element without delay.
  • Examples:
    • A web server receiving incoming HTTP requests one after another.
    • A caching system receiving page requests sequentially.
  • This incremental arrival means the algorithm never knows what future inputs will be.

2.2 Decision Making Without Complete Information

  • Online algorithms make irrevocable decisions at each step based on only the data seen so far.
  • Without knowledge of future inputs, the algorithm must balance current needs with potential future scenarios.
  • Strategies often involve:
    • Greedy choices: picking the best immediate option.
    • Conservative choices: reserving resources for unknown future demands.
    • Randomization: introducing randomness to hedge against worst-case inputs.
  • The inability to revise decisions makes it challenging to optimize overall outcomes.

2.3 Performance Metrics: Competitive Ratio and Beyond

  • Competitive Ratio: The most common metric to evaluate online algorithms.
    • It compares the online algorithm’s performance to an ideal offline algorithm that knows all inputs in advance.
    • A lower competitive ratio indicates better performance.
  • Other metrics:
    • Average-case performance: How the algorithm performs on typical inputs rather than worst-case.
    • Resource usage: Time and space complexity.
    • Regret: In learning-augmented algorithms, measuring how much worse the online decisions are compared to an optimal hindsight strategy.
  • Understanding different metrics helps tailor algorithms to specific real-world needs.

2.4 Adversarial Models and Assumptions

  • Inputs can be modeled as:
    • Adversarial: The worst possible sequence chosen to maximize the algorithm’s cost.
    • Randomized or Stochastic: Inputs follow a known probability distribution.
  • Competitive analysis usually assumes an adversarial model to guarantee robustness.
  • Some algorithms use randomization to perform well against adversarial inputs.
  • Different assumptions about input nature affect algorithm design and guarantees.

2.5 Memory and Computational Constraints in Real-Time

  • Online algorithms often operate under strict constraints:
    • Limited memory (especially in streaming or embedded systems).
    • Limited processing time per input (real-time response requirements).
  • These constraints impact:
    • The complexity of algorithms that can be used.
    • How much history or context the algorithm can retain.
  • Designing efficient algorithms requires balancing quality of decisions with resource usage.

3. Fundamental Online Problems and Their Algorithms

This section explores classic problems in online algorithm research, showcasing how online algorithms are designed and analyzed in well-studied scenarios. Understanding these foundational problems provides insight into key techniques and challenges in online decision-making.

3.1 The Ski Rental Problem

  • Problem Description:
    A skier must decide each day whether to rent skis for a fixed daily fee or buy skis outright for a larger one-time cost, without knowing how many days they will ski.
  • Online Challenge:
    The decision to buy skis is irreversible and must be made without knowing future usage.
  • Key Algorithmic Idea:
    Rent until the accumulated rental cost equals the purchase price, then buy.
  • Competitive Ratio:
    The deterministic algorithm has a competitive ratio of 2 (at most twice the optimal offline cost).
  • Significance:
    This problem is a simple but fundamental example illustrating trade-offs in online decisions under uncertainty.

3.2 The Paging and Caching Problem

  • Problem Description:
    A system has limited fast memory (cache) and must decide which pages to keep in cache when new pages are requested.
  • Online Challenge:
    The algorithm must decide which pages to evict without knowing future requests.
  • Common Algorithms:
    • Least Recently Used (LRU): Evicts the page not used for the longest time.
    • First-In-First-Out (FIFO): Evicts the oldest loaded page.
  • Competitive Analysis:
    No deterministic online algorithm can have a competitive ratio better than the cache size.
  • Applications:
    Memory management in OS, database systems, web caching.

3.3 The Online Bipartite Matching Problem

  • Problem Description:
    Given two sets of vertices (e.g., jobs and workers), one set is known upfront, and the other arrives online; the algorithm must match arriving vertices to the offline set to maximize matches.
  • Key Algorithms:
    • Greedy matching: Matches the arriving vertex to any available compatible vertex.
    • Ranking algorithm: Randomly ranks offline vertices and matches arriving vertices to the highest-ranked compatible offline vertex.
  • Competitive Ratio:
    The Ranking algorithm achieves a competitive ratio of 1−1e1 – \frac{1}{e}1−e1​ (~0.63).
  • Applications:
    Online advertising, resource allocation, and job scheduling.

3.4 The Secretary Problem

  • Problem Description:
    You must hire the best candidate out of nnn who appear sequentially in random order, but once rejected, a candidate cannot be recalled.
  • Optimal Strategy:
    Observe and reject the first ~37% (i.e., 1/e1/e1/e) of candidates, then select the next candidate better than all previously seen.
  • Success Probability:
    Approximately 37% chance of selecting the best candidate.
  • Relevance:
    Illustrates the power of optimal stopping theory in online decisions.

3.5 Online Load Balancing

  • Problem Description:
    Tasks arrive over time and must be assigned to machines to minimize the maximum load.
  • Online Challenge:
    Assigning tasks without future knowledge may cause imbalance.
  • Typical Algorithms:
    • Greedy assignment: Assign to the machine with the least current load.
  • Competitive Ratio:
    Depends on the model but generally shows trade-offs between fairness and efficiency.
  • Applications:
    Cloud computing, distributed systems.

3.6 Online Facility Location

  • Problem Description:
    Requests arrive online, and the algorithm must decide where to open facilities to serve them cost-effectively.
  • Online Challenge:
    Opening too many facilities is costly, but opening too few causes high service costs.
  • Algorithms:
    Various primal-dual and greedy approaches exist.
  • Competitive Analysis:
    Algorithms achieve logarithmic competitive ratios.
  • Applications:
    Supply chain management, network design.

4. Competitive Analysis

Competitive analysis is the fundamental theoretical framework used to evaluate the performance of online algorithms. It provides a way to measure how well an online algorithm performs relative to an ideal offline algorithm that has complete knowledge of the future.

4.1 Definition and Importance of Competitive Ratio

  • Competitive Ratio is defined as the worst-case ratio between the cost (or value) of the online algorithm’s solution and that of the optimal offline algorithm: Competitive Ratio=max⁡ICost of Online Algorithm on ICost of Optimal Offline Algorithm on I\text{Competitive Ratio} = \max_{I} \frac{\text{Cost of Online Algorithm on } I}{\text{Cost of Optimal Offline Algorithm on } I}Competitive Ratio=Imax​Cost of Optimal Offline Algorithm on ICost of Online Algorithm on I​ where III represents any input instance.
  • Why it matters:
    • It quantifies the price of making decisions without future knowledge.
    • A smaller competitive ratio means the online algorithm performs closer to the offline optimum.
    • It provides a strong worst-case guarantee that is independent of input distribution.

4.2 Worst-Case vs. Average-Case Analysis

  • Worst-Case Analysis:
    • Assumes an adversary picks the worst possible input sequence to maximize the online algorithm’s cost.
    • Provides robust guarantees, ensuring reliable performance even under hostile or unpredictable conditions.
    • Competitive ratio is a worst-case measure.
  • Average-Case Analysis:
    • Assumes inputs follow a known probability distribution.
    • Measures expected performance rather than worst case.
    • More realistic for some applications but harder to analyze.
  • Both analyses are complementary; worst-case offers safety nets, average-case often yields better practical insights.

4.3 Examples of Competitive Ratios for Classic Problems

  • Ski Rental Problem: Deterministic competitive ratio is 2.
  • Paging/Caching: No deterministic online algorithm can have a competitive ratio better than the cache size kkk. LRU achieves this bound.
  • Online Bipartite Matching: The Ranking algorithm achieves a competitive ratio of 1−1e1 – \frac{1}{e}1−e1​ (~0.63).
  • Secretary Problem: The probability of success is about 1/e1/e1/e, analogous to competitive analysis in probabilistic terms.

These examples show a range of competitive ratios depending on problem structure and algorithm design.

4.4 Limitations of Competitive Analysis

  • Pessimistic Viewpoint:
    Worst-case inputs may rarely occur in practice, so competitive ratios can be overly pessimistic.
  • Ignores Distribution:
    Does not capture how an algorithm performs on typical or average inputs.
  • Sometimes Too Harsh:
    Competitive ratios can be very large, offering little practical guidance on algorithm quality.
  • Doesn’t Consider Resource Augmentation:
    Sometimes online algorithms are compared fairly only if they have similar resources as the offline algorithm; real-world scenarios may allow more flexibility.

4.5 Alternative Evaluation Methods (e.g., Resource Augmentation)

To address the limitations of classical competitive analysis, researchers use alternative approaches:

  • Resource Augmentation:
    The online algorithm is allowed more resources (e.g., faster machines, larger cache) than the offline optimum. This often improves competitive ratios and reflects practical settings better.
  • Beyond Worst-Case Analysis:
    Frameworks like random order analysis, smoothed analysis, and instance optimality evaluate performance under less adversarial or more realistic input models.
  • Learning-Augmented Algorithms:
    Algorithms that use machine-learned predictions to improve decisions, balancing worst-case guarantees with practical performance.
  • Empirical Evaluation:
    Simulations and experiments measure actual performance on real or synthetic datasets.

5. Designing Online Algorithms

Designing effective online algorithms requires clever strategies to handle incomplete information and make near-optimal decisions as new data arrives. This section covers common design techniques and approaches used in the field.

5.1 Greedy Strategies

  • Concept:
    Make the locally optimal decision at each step, hoping it leads to a good overall outcome.
  • Examples:
    • In paging, evicting the page least recently used (LRU) or first in, first out (FIFO).
    • Assigning incoming jobs to the least loaded machine immediately.
  • Advantages:
    Simple to implement and often perform reasonably well in practice.
  • Limitations:
    Greedy choices may be shortsighted and lead to suboptimal outcomes in some scenarios.

5.2 Randomized Online Algorithms

  • Concept:
    Use randomness in decision-making to avoid predictable worst-case inputs and improve expected performance.
  • How it helps:
    Makes it harder for an adversary to craft inputs that force poor performance.
  • Example:
    The randomized marking algorithm for paging achieves a better expected competitive ratio than any deterministic algorithm.
  • Competitive Ratio:
    Often measured in expectation over the algorithm’s internal randomness.

5.3 Primal-Dual Method for Online Problems

  • Concept:
    Utilize the primal-dual framework from linear programming to design online algorithms, maintaining feasible dual solutions as inputs arrive.
  • How it works:
    The algorithm updates primal and dual variables incrementally, ensuring a bound on the competitive ratio.
  • Applications:
    Widely used in online network design, facility location, and caching problems.
  • Advantages:
    Provides strong theoretical guarantees and a systematic design approach.

5.4 Learning-Augmented Online Algorithms

  • Concept:
    Incorporate predictions or advice from machine learning models into the online decision-making process.
  • Benefits:
    Can significantly improve practical performance when predictions are accurate.
  • Challenges:
    Designing algorithms that remain robust when predictions are imperfect or adversarial.
  • Examples:
    Predicting future requests in caching to improve eviction decisions.

5.5 Advice Complexity and Algorithms with Predictions

  • Advice Complexity:
    Studies how much additional information (advice bits) an online algorithm needs to achieve a certain competitive ratio.
  • Algorithms with Predictions:
    Algorithms augmented with imperfect hints or predictions from external sources.
  • Goal:
    Balance between reliance on advice and worst-case robustness.
  • Research Focus:
    Quantifying trade-offs between prediction quality, advice quantity, and algorithm performance.

6. Case Studies of Online Algorithms in Practice

This section highlights real-world applications where online algorithms play a crucial role, demonstrating how theory translates into practical systems that make real-time decisions.

6.1 Online Advertising and Real-Time Bidding

  • Context:
    Advertisers bid in real-time for ad slots as users visit websites or apps.
  • Online Challenge:
    Bids and ad placement decisions must be made in milliseconds without knowing future traffic or competitor bids.
  • Algorithms Used:
    Online matching algorithms and budget management strategies.
  • Impact:
    Efficient real-time bidding maximizes revenue for publishers and return on investment for advertisers.

6.2 Online Scheduling in Cloud Computing

  • Context:
    Cloud providers receive tasks or jobs dynamically and must allocate computing resources efficiently.
  • Online Challenge:
    Scheduling decisions must be made immediately to meet performance SLAs without full knowledge of future workload.
  • Approaches:
    Greedy load balancing, priority queues, and learning-augmented algorithms to predict task demands.
  • Benefits:
    Improved resource utilization, reduced latency, and cost savings.

6.3 Network Routing and Traffic Management

  • Context:
    Internet routers and traffic controllers decide how to forward packets or allocate bandwidth in real-time.
  • Online Challenge:
    Network conditions and traffic demands fluctuate unpredictably.
  • Algorithms Used:
    Online routing algorithms that adapt paths dynamically to avoid congestion and minimize delays.
  • Outcome:
    Enhanced network reliability and performance.

6.4 Autonomous Systems and Robotics

  • Context:
    Robots and autonomous vehicles make navigation and control decisions based on sensor inputs arriving in real-time.
  • Online Challenge:
    Must react quickly to dynamic environments and uncertain information.
  • Techniques:
    Online decision-making frameworks combined with machine learning for prediction and adaptation.
  • Impact:
    Safer, more efficient autonomous operations.

6.5 Financial Trading Algorithms

  • Context:
    Automated trading systems analyze market data streams and place buy/sell orders continuously.
  • Online Challenge:
    Decisions must be made with partial and noisy information, and latency is critical.
  • Algorithmic Strategies:
    Online portfolio selection, market making, and high-frequency trading algorithms.
  • Result:
    Improved trade execution, risk management, and profitability.

7. Challenges and Open Problems

Despite significant advances, online algorithms still face many difficult challenges and open research problems. This section explores these ongoing issues and future directions.

7.1 Handling Uncertainty and Noise in Inputs

  • Problem:
    Real-world inputs often contain noise, errors, or uncertainty, complicating decision-making.
  • Challenges:
    Designing algorithms robust to imperfect or adversarially corrupted data.
  • Research Directions:
    Integrating probabilistic models, robust optimization, and adaptive learning to handle noisy environments.

7.2 Trade-offs Between Optimality and Computational Efficiency

  • Problem:
    Achieving near-optimal decisions often requires complex computations, which may be infeasible in real-time.
  • Challenges:
    Balancing solution quality with strict time and resource constraints.
  • Approaches:
    Approximation algorithms, heuristics, and fast-update data structures.

7.3 Dealing with Dynamic and Changing Environments

  • Problem:
    Input distributions, system parameters, or constraints may change over time.
  • Challenges:
    Designing algorithms that adapt online to evolving conditions without losing performance guarantees.
  • Emerging Solutions:
    Algorithms with feedback loops, reinforcement learning, and adaptive parameter tuning.

7.4 Online Algorithms in Distributed Systems

  • Problem:
    Distributed systems require coordinated decisions across multiple agents with partial local information.
  • Challenges:
    Handling communication delays, inconsistent views, and decentralized control.
  • Research Areas:
    Designing distributed online algorithms and protocols with provable guarantees.

7.5 Incorporating Machine Learning and Predictions

  • Problem:
    Leveraging predictions to improve online decisions while maintaining robustness.
  • Challenges:
    Handling inaccurate or adversarial predictions gracefully.
  • Focus Areas:
    Learning-augmented algorithms, advice complexity, and hybrid models combining theory and data-driven methods.

8. Advanced Topics and Extensions

This section delves into cutting-edge research areas and sophisticated extensions of online algorithms, reflecting how the field continues to evolve and adapt to new challenges.

8.1 Online Algorithms with Advice and Predictions

  • Concept:
    Algorithms enhanced with additional information (advice) or predictions about future inputs to improve performance.
  • Types of Advice:
    • Perfect or imperfect predictions from machine learning models.
    • Bits of advice from an oracle or offline computations.
  • Goal:
    To achieve better-than-classical competitive ratios while maintaining robustness against incorrect advice.
  • Challenges:
    Balancing trust in advice versus worst-case guarantees.

8.2 Beyond Worst-Case Analysis

  • Motivation:
    Classical competitive analysis is often too pessimistic. Beyond worst-case frameworks provide more realistic assessments.
  • Examples:
    • Random order analysis: Inputs arrive in random order, not adversarial.
    • Smoothed analysis: Inputs are adversarially chosen but slightly perturbed randomly.
    • Parameter-based analysis: Performance depends on problem parameters rather than worst-case input size.
  • Benefits:
    Better predictive power for practical algorithm performance.

8.3 Online Algorithms for Big Data and Streaming

  • Context:
    Massive datasets that cannot be stored entirely require algorithms processing data streams efficiently.
  • Key Challenges:
    Limited memory, single-pass processing, and fast decision-making.
  • Techniques:
    • Sketching and sampling methods.
    • Approximate query processing.
  • Applications:
    Network monitoring, sensor networks, and real-time analytics.

8.4 Multi-Agent Online Decision Making

  • Scenario:
    Multiple autonomous agents make online decisions that may interact or compete.
  • Challenges:
    Coordination, communication constraints, and strategic behavior.
  • Models:
    Game-theoretic online algorithms, distributed decision-making frameworks.
  • Applications:
    Traffic routing, distributed sensor networks, and online marketplaces.

8.5 Robustness and Adaptivity in Online Algorithms

  • Concept:
    Designing algorithms that adapt to changing environments and maintain stable performance.
  • Techniques:
    • Self-adjusting algorithms.
    • Feedback-based adaptation.
  • Importance:
    Ensures long-term reliability and efficiency in dynamic real-world systems.

9. Tools and Frameworks for Developing Online Algorithms

This section covers practical tools, platforms, and methodologies that assist researchers and practitioners in designing, testing, and evaluating online algorithms effectively.

9.1 Simulation and Benchmarking Online Algorithms

  • Purpose:
    Simulating online algorithms on synthetic and real-world datasets to evaluate their performance under various scenarios.
  • Features:
    • Modeling different input sequences, including adversarial, random, or real traffic data.
    • Measuring metrics like competitive ratio, latency, resource utilization.
  • Benefits:
    Helps in understanding practical strengths and weaknesses beyond theoretical guarantees.

9.2 Libraries and Software Tools

  • Available Tools:
    • Libraries for implementing classic online algorithms (e.g., paging, scheduling).
    • Frameworks for streaming data processing (e.g., Apache Flink, Apache Kafka) useful for real-time algorithm deployment.
  • Features:
    • Support for incremental data input and real-time decision-making.
    • Tools for performance profiling and debugging.

9.3 Experimental Methodologies

  • Designing Experiments:
    • Selecting relevant datasets representing typical and worst-case scenarios.
    • Defining clear metrics and baseline comparisons.
  • Reproducibility:
    Ensuring experiments can be repeated and results verified by others.
  • Challenges:
    Balancing realism with control in experiments.

9.4 Performance Evaluation in Real-World Settings

  • Deployment:
    Testing online algorithms in live systems or controlled environments.
  • Monitoring:
    Continuous tracking of algorithm behavior and system metrics.
  • Feedback Loops:
    Using real-world data to refine and improve algorithms iteratively.
  • Case Studies:
    Examples from networking, cloud computing, and autonomous systems.

10. Summary and Future Directions

This concluding section summarizes the key insights about online algorithms and explores promising future research areas and practical developments.

10.1 Recap of Key Concepts and Results

  • Online algorithms operate in environments where input arrives sequentially and decisions must be made without full knowledge of the future.
  • The competitive ratio remains the cornerstone metric for evaluating performance.
  • Classic problems like the ski rental, paging, and online matching illustrate fundamental challenges and solution strategies.
  • Design techniques include greedy, randomized, primal-dual, and learning-augmented algorithms.
  • Practical applications span internet advertising, cloud computing, robotics, finance, and more.

10.2 Emerging Trends and Technologies

  • Learning-Augmented Algorithms: Combining machine learning with online decision-making to improve adaptability.
  • Beyond Worst-Case Analysis: More realistic performance guarantees through smoothed and average-case models.
  • Big Data and Streaming: Scaling online algorithms to handle massive, high-velocity data streams.
  • Distributed Online Algorithms: Addressing coordination and communication challenges in multi-agent systems.
  • Robustness and Adaptivity: Ensuring algorithms maintain performance under dynamic and uncertain conditions.

10.3 Future Research Directions in Online Algorithms

  • Developing frameworks that gracefully handle noisy and imperfect predictions.
  • Balancing performance, resource constraints, and adaptivity in increasingly complex environments.
  • Enhancing algorithms for emerging fields such as autonomous systems, IoT, and edge computing.
  • Bridging theory and practice through better experimental validation and deployment strategies.
  • Exploring ethical and societal impacts of automated real-time decision-making.

10.4 Practical Implications for Industry and Technology

  • Online algorithms enable responsive, efficient, and scalable systems critical for modern technology infrastructure.
  • Businesses can leverage online decision-making to optimize operations, improve user experience, and enhance profitability.
  • Ongoing advances promise smarter, more reliable automation in sectors like finance, transportation, and communications.
Related Story

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *